| 1 |
formulate questions to generate new data |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 2 |
recognize perceived self interests of everyone involved in or affected by incident |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 3 |
define physical changes produced during incident |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 3a |
define pre-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 3b |
document post-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 3c |
define physiological changes (injuries) during incident |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3d |
define pre-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 3e |
document post-occurrence states |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 4 |
Identify "actors" involved in an occurrence |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 5 |
define and order data acquisition tasks |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 6 |
protect data sources against premature change |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| 6a |
identify/protect physical objects likely to change |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| 6b |
identify/protect people data at risk |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| 6c |
control personal risks to investigator |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| 70 |
define actions required to produce observed conditions |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 71 |
Acquire data about interactions from witnesses |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 72 |
acquire data about interactions from object sources |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 77 |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - photographs |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 77a |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - sketches |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 77b |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids - drawings |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 77c |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids -maps |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 77d |
prepare investigation graphics/visual aids -charts or graphs |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 80 |
transform observations into documentable format |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 81 |
organize events sequentially |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 81a |
break down/decompose events |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 81b |
transform observations into form entries |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
prepare narrative description of what happened |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 83 |
define events sets/pairs |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 84 |
apply cause-effect logic to events sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 84a |
show causal links among events in sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 84b |
define gaps in events flow logic |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 86 |
hypothesize bounded scenarios to fill gaps |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
| 87 |
acquire data to verify hypotheses |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
| 88 |
perform necessary/sufficient logic to event sets |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
| 14 |
distinguish relevant from irrelevant events/data |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 15 |
use events sets to define problem relationships |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 16 |
use events sets to evaluate problems/needs |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 17 |
select problems to address with recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 18 |
identify candidate actions to address problems |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 19 |
use events sets to evaluate candidate recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 20 |
develop rationale for selecting needed recommendations |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 21 |
develop recommendations effectiveness assessment plans and procedures |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 22 |
do objective quality assurance procedures for investigation outputs |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 22a |
do objective quality assurance procedures investigation process |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
| 23 |
prepare credible report |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 90 |
respond to media inquiries |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 24 |
select investigation methodology/protocols |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 25 |
design AI tasks to take full advantage of available resources. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 26 |
keep energies focused on remaining unknown events |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
set daily task priorities for each investigator or group |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 60 |
manage work force performance |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 62 |
assure needed information exchanges among workers |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 63 |
conduct public and private briefings |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 64 |
manage quality assurance procedures for team tasks and outputs |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 65 |
manage recommendation development process |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 66 |
manage report preparation |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 101 |
implement multinational investigating protocols |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
8 |
8 |
|
| 102 |
implement customs and conventions of host states |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 103 |
manage multicultural multinational investigation teams |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 1100 |
negotiate participation by non-government experts |
|
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
| 40 |
adopt investigation process critique criteria |
|
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
| 41 |
critique investigation process performance |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 42 |
develop investigation improvement proposals |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
| 43 |
upgrade investigation procedures |
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
|
Ludwig Benner, Jr. Initial project plan, framework
Jeremy Dawson - information about forms, tasks